 |
Caty |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Who is vovevi, who is behind it? Are you priests or are you laymen or women?
I mean, who guarantees the suggestions based on these passages are trustworthy?
I don't want to be a Saint Thomas, but one hears such things!
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
On the contrary, it's only right to act like Saint Thomas! In the Gospels,
this distrustful character plays a significant and absolutely not casual
role. He represents suspicion, that's true, but prudence too: as VERB TO LIVE
isn't The Word, in which one must believe through a profound, fundamental
act of faith, but only a translation of It with an oracular purpose, your
question is absolutely legitimate.
In any case, more than who is "physically" behind VERB TO LIVE,
the best question would be on its origin and on the criteria it follows
to propose its suggestions with the necessary reliability. Let me clarify
a fundamental thing: in the messages of VERB TO LIVE, there is absolutely
nothing sacred or "divine". They are mere deductions, almost automatically
derived from the deep study of the New Testament, and from the interpretations
of It scholars have given through centuries of theological studies. To these
almost obvious deductions, we have applied a "technique" for coupling
the messages derived from the ancient law of numbers and the principle of
random. This is all! So, are the messages of VERB TO LIVE reliable? On the
basis we've just given, yours is the answer....
|

|
|
|